Statistical Comparison of Components of
the BCS
Formula and Weighted Wins
Component that had both Number 1 and Number 2 teams in
System | Years |
Both Top 2
teams |
Percent |
Harris Poll and AP | 16 |
13 |
81 |
Coaches Poll | 16 |
13 |
81 |
Billingsley | 15 |
12 |
80 |
Weighted Wins* | 16 |
12 |
75 |
Colley Matrix | 13 |
9 |
69 |
Anderson Hester | 16 |
10 |
63 |
Wolfe | 13 |
8 |
62 |
Massey | 15 |
9 |
60 |
Sagarin | 16 |
9 |
56 |
System | Years |
Rated No. 1 |
Percent |
Weighted Wins* | 16 |
11 |
69 |
Massey | 15 |
7 |
47 |
Colley Matrix | 13 |
6 |
46 |
Harris Poll and AP | 16 |
7 |
44 |
Billingsley | 15 |
6 |
40 |
Anderson Hester | 16 |
6 |
38 |
Sagarin | 16 |
6 |
38 |
Wolfe |
13
|
4 |
31 |
Coaches Poll | 16 |
5 |
31 |
In fact, the complete BCS Formula only had a 50% record in identifying the National Champion
(8 out of 16) before the title game compared to a 69% record of Weighted Wins (11 out of 16).